Asurion

Selected projects & case studies.

Project 1
Project 2
Role
Enterprise UX · Risk & Decision Support
Problem Space & Context

The first version of Compass struggled with adoption and effectiveness. Like many internally built enterprise tools, it prioritized functionality over usability. While it introduced powerful new capabilities, the experience was dense and cognitively overwhelming for fraud analysts who needed to make high-stakes decisions across large volumes of data. It was paired with nearly half a dozen other tools that analysts had to constantly cycle through.

As a result, analysts spent more time navigating their tools than analyzing cases, thus limiting the platform’s overall impact.

Filters in Compass

The redesign of Compass focused on improving both user effectiveness and operational efficiency. We aligned on two primary KPIs to evaluate success: Improve decision accuracy for fraud analysts, and reduce the average review time per case.

Supporting goals included:

  • Making complex data easier to scan, compare, and interpret
  • Increasing analyst confidence in fraud determinations
  • Reducing the time required to onboard and train new analysts
  • Encouraging adoption of advanced detection features without increasing cognitive load
Discovery & Research

To better understand how Compass was used in practice, I job shadowed insurance adjusters and fraud analysts as they reviewed live cases. This allowed me to observe workflows end-to-end and identify usability issues firsthand. Analysts were quick to tell me about the challenges of their role and the process inefficiencies they faced each day.

Through direct observation and follow-up discussions, I uncovered key challenges, including:

  • Analysts spending significant time navigating the interface rather than analyzing risk
  • Important fraud signals being buried within dense data layouts
  • Workarounds and manual note-taking (often handwritten on sticky notes) to compensate for missing system feedback
  • Inconsistent workflows driven by unclear prioritization within the tool

These insights informed both the structural redesign of Compass 2.0 and the prioritization of features that would meaningfully improve analyst effectiveness.

Design Sprint
Design Sprint Artifacts

Compass 2.0 was redesigned from the ground up with a strong focus on progressive disclosure, visual hierarchy, and decision support. I led the design of a refreshed UI and feature set that:

  • Clarified information architecture to surface the most relevant signals first
  • Reduced cognitive load through layout, grouping, and visual prioritization
  • Supported faster pattern recognition across cases

Design concepts were prototyped and tested iteratively with fraud analysts, creating a continuous feedback loop between users, design, and product. This iterative approach ensured that usability improvements directly mapped to analyst needs rather than assumed workflows.

After launching Compass 2.0, we shifted focus from usability to decision intelligence. I collaborated with product and engineering to introduce new feature sets, including:

  • Link Analysis, which surfaced relationships and shared attributes across historical cases
  • Automated Risk Assessment, which leveraged AI to evaluate signals and assign a risk score to each case

These tools guided analysts toward the most important areas of investigation, allowing them to focus attention where it mattered most.

The redesign of Compass and the introduction of decision-support features delivered measurable improvements across key business metrics.

By enabling analysts to make better, faster decisions, Compass became the core platform for fraud prevention at Asurion. It reduced reliance on many external tools and enabled analysts to move quickly while staying focused on their adjudication process. The program’s increased effectiveness enabled a higher volume of claims to be processed without increasing headcount. The project became a huge success for Asurion, and I am proud of the work our team accomplished.

39

%
reduction in average case review time

71

%
increase in adoption of advanced fraud detection features

48

%
improvement in fraud decision accuracy
Consumer UX · Growth & Platform Foundations
Problem Space & Context

The phone-only scheduling model introduced several critical challenges:

  • High operational costs driven by call center dependency
  • Limited scalability, constraining market expansion
  • Friction for customers who expected fast, self-service booking
  • Inconsistent scheduling experiences across Asurion’s growing portfolio of home services

To unlock growth and improve the customer experience, Asurion needed an online scheduling solution that could reduce friction, improve completion rates, and scale efficiently across markets and service types.

I served as the lead designer on the 6-person product team responsible for addressing this problem.

ScheduleRepair_Mobile

The primary goals of the project were to:

  • Make it easy for customers to schedule an appliance repair online
  • Improve start-to-finish scheduling completion rates
  • Enable the service to scale to up to 15 markets by June of ’22

From a business perspective, the value was twofold:

  • For customers: Quickly understand availability and pricing without calling a support center
  • For Asurion: Reduce call center costs and unlock faster service expansion

A secondary goal emerged as the project progressed: Asurion’s growing portfolio of home services, each with its own bespoke scheduling flow, highlighted the need for a universal scheduling component. Our team was asked to establish the foundation for a reusable scheduling module that could support multiple service types with a consistent customer experience.

Discovery & Research

To inform the design, I began by analyzing best-in-class scheduling experiences from platforms such as Airbnb, Thumbtack, and TaskRabbit, focusing on how they structured inputs, communicated availability, and reduced friction in multi-step flows.

In parallel, I audited Asurion’s existing scheduling patterns across other services and reviewed performance data to understand where users dropped off or encountered confusion. I then partnered closely with my Product Manager to:

  • Define functional and technical requirements
  • Align on success metrics
  • Establish a flexible framework that could scale beyond appliance repair

This combination of external inspiration and internal performance data helped ground the solution in both proven UX patterns and Asurion’s unique operational constraints.

Based on research and requirements gathering, we identified the minimum data requirements to schedule an appliance repair. I then optimized the order of user inputs to collect the needed information as efficiently as possible:

  1. Appliance type selection
  2. Appliance brand and customer ZIP code
  3. Optional freeform description of the issue
  4. Date and time selection via calendar
  5. Customer address
  6. Contact information

I designed the flow to progressively disclose complexity, allowing users to move forward quickly without feeling overwhelmed.

To humanize the service and build trust, I made photography of Asurion Experts in the field a prominent visual element throughout the experience. This was reinforced by displaying customer star ratings and a direct link to real customer reviews.

These elements helped communicate the value of the service and reassured users that they were booking a high-quality, in-home experience.

The resulting design also served as the starting point for Asurion’s universal scheduler, establishing reusable patterns that could be extended to other home services.

The online scheduling experience unlocked meaningful improvements for both customers and the business:

  • 28% increase in scheduling completion rates
  • 40% reduction in phone-based scheduling volume
  • Enabled expansion of appliance repair into additional U.S. markets
  • Established a starting framework for a home services scheduling module

The project played a key role in transforming appliance repair from a pilot program into a scalable growth channel for Asurion.

28

%
increase in scheduling completion rates

40

%
reduction in phone-based scheduling volume

After launching the new scheduling pattern for appliance repair, I had the opportunity to extend the experience across other Asurion products. This allowed me to stress-test the pattern’s flexibility and determine whether it could truly function as a universal scheduling solution.

When Asurion partnered with Verizon to offer installation and support services for smart home devices, I was tasked with designing a co-branded scheduling experience that leveraged the appliance repair framework. I needed to adapt the pattern to a new service category with different brand requirements and operational rules, all without rebuilding the flow from scratch.

Using the modular structure established in the appliance repair experience, I was able to:

  • Reconfigure service-specific inputs while maintaining consistent step logic
  • Adapt the UI to support Verizon co-branding guidelines
  • Preserve trust-building elements such as ratings and technician visibility
  • Maintain a consistent mental model across service types

Around the same time, I provided design guidance to a colleague developing a scheduling flow for Asurion’s tech repair services. By sharing the structural framework, component patterns, and sequencing logic from the original project, we avoided duplicative design work and improved cross-product consistency.

What began as a growth initiative for appliance repair evolved into a reusable scheduling foundation that accelerated development across multiple service lines.

BONUS UX HIGHLIGHTS

TV Selection (Old design) TV Selection (New Design)
PoS Checkout UI